BarroMetrics Views: A Quiet Revolution in Learning Theory II
Today we’ll look at the ‘Ignition’ Process of Daniel Coyle’s theory.
Another name for ‘ignition’ could be ‘initial and long-motivation’. There are two sources for this element:
- That brought by the student and
- That brought by the coach.
The student brings to the table the initial drive and the persistence and commitment to do whatever it takes to achieve his dream. My key takeaway from this section was the difference between Ignition and Deep Practice. Deep Practice is a slow process whereas initial Ignition is a sharp, and ‘primal’ - a deep emotional process. Coyle suggests three sources for this ‘primal cue’ and they all involve connecting to our default futures.
The coach brings context and the insight that allows the incremental improvement that is necessary to Deep Practice. This in my view was the weakest section of the book. In Aussie terms ‘a trifle airy-fairy’.
The two sections are important not so much for the details, but rather for the clear message that we need to ignite our emotions into the learning process; moreover, we maintain our commitment and persistence by continuing to invoke our feelings. For me, perhaps not surprisingly, the imagery that is assisting me is the picture of Myelin growing each time I act in a disciplined manner - which means my skills are growing - which means I am taking another step forward to my success. And that image keeps my home fires burning sufficiently for me to do what I may otherwise not do.
Monday, I’ll consider Deep Practice.
Refer this blog post to a friend or colleague…
