Tonight I’ll complete my answers to the questions I received. But before I do that, I want to draw your attention to the ’search’ functionality available to all readers. Figure 1 shows its location - just type key words and you’ll have all the entries containing the key words .

Now, let’s turn to the questions.

The first set asks: why I continue researching since my approach to the market makes money? The assumption here seems to be either: you can’t be making money or you wouldn’t continue researching or since the method works, why bother?

The first answer would be to challenge the assumptions. The fact that my methods work under present conditions, does not mean that they will continue to work if market conditions change. By seeing markets from different perspectives, I have a chance of acquiring fresh insights. Some insights, though valid, I may not be able to adopt because they don’t suit my personality; others may contribute to my store of knowledge. The point is markets are not static and our knowledge and skills need to keep pace with them.

That answer can be described as my utilitarian response. A more important aspect is this: my nature is one that seeks CANI (Tony Robbins’ Constant and Never-Ending Improvement). I am constantly seeking to improve my skills (reading, writing. teaching, trading etc) and self-awareness. I budget 10% of annual income to ‘research and development’. CANI is part of who I am.

The second set of questions asks: what is the basis by which I recommend sites and courses? One question included a statement that the reader believed I received a commission.

I thought I dealt with this in the blog but for the record: I see nothing ethically wrong about being an affiliate vendor. If I did receive a commission, I would state it up front. The thing is, it’s not that easy to be an affiliate. The vendor and I would have to share the same idea about the product’s value and cost; I’d associate myself only with those products that offer value for value. This would be the sole criterion.

So let me again state: in respect of the commercial sites mentioned in ‘The Meaning of Money’ (http://tradingsuccess.com/blog/meaning-of-money-325.html) , I have not been offered, nor have I accepted any commission for the recommendation. OK?

As to the basis for selection: I select sites and products that I believe have something genuine to offer the trading community. They can be free or charge a fee - the cost is only relevant when I ask myself: do I believe the product is offering value?

The final set of questions: why won’t I run a seminar in the US? The simple answer to this one is this.

I dislike organising seminars - they take too much time and effort. If anyone want to organise one, I’ll be happy to consider the venture. I run seminars because:

  • I am a good teacher,
  • I love to do it and
  • It helps my branding. When I approach an institution or high-net worth individual to participate in a fund, it helps if my ‘name’ is a familiar one.

I hope I have answered all questions. It’d be better if you send them to the blog; if you do that. I’ll address them specifically.

05-07-2008-search.jpg

Figure 1 Search