Fri 16 May 2008
ES 05-14-2008 III
Posted by ray under Written Plan
Yesterday we laid the theoretical foundations for the analysis of May 14’s price action. Today we’ll start on the recap of my trade journal.
I provided the context in “ES 05-14-2008 Video (http://tradingsuccess.com/blog/es-05-14-2008-346.html). So, let’s start the blog with the first snapshot I took - the one I took during the ‘B’ period (Figure 1). At that stage, I observed:
- The probability of a trend day up because of the ‘open-gap’ pattern (http://tradingsuccess.com/blog/sp-intraday-2-169.html). Instead of making any attempt to close the ‘open-gap’, the market went straight up from the open.
- The range of the ‘A’ period is only 8 points - ATR is 22 + 10, -5 standard deviations. This small range for the ‘A’ period also suggested a trend day because of the context and because the open and subsequent price activity was above the previous day’s value area.
- Market Delta identified 1409 as the probable low of the day - note the -151 Delta volume, light red.
FIGURE 1 ‘B’ Period
Figure 2 shows the Delta Volume to 11:00 am
FIGURE 2 Delta Volume
No trade yet.
Figure 3 shows the completion of the Initial Balance.
FIGURE 3 Initial Balance
At the end of “C”, I decided that:
- The market was forming a Double Distribution Trend Day.
- I wanted to be a buyer from 1414.75 to 1412.5
- If I was wrong the market would rotate past 1412.5 and re-print the opening price. I expected that at the worst 1410.5 would hold (beginning of point of inflection).
- Stops were placed at 1378.75 with the intention of raising them to just under the lows of the day once the market had a Range Extension establishing the neckline of the double distribution.
- Target for the move 1467.75. The risk reward was marginal. I decided to take the trade because if correct, the stops would be brought up to 1407.75 relatively quickly; most importantly, if I was wrong, I felt I’d have time to exit with little loss.
I entered the market in the 1414 to 1412.75 range.
Figure 4 shows the Delta at 11:45 am. The high volume at the top of the range suggested continuation and that the trend day was alive and well.
FIGURE 4 11:45
Figure 5 shows “I” period breakout. When the market rotated back into the day’s range, it raised an amber flag to the Trend Day Scenario and raised the possibility of a Failed Trend day (which meant the possibility of a Bearish Neutral Day if we closed in the lower quadrant of the range). As readers know, I hold the “J” (2:30 am EST) and “K” (3:00 am EST), to be the critical time periods for the ES. May 14 proved to be no exception.
FIGURE 5 ‘I’ Period
In ‘K’, the market attempted to push up and failed (note the large volume at 1420.5). When the market started to rotate back down, I exited all longs at prices ranging from 1417.50 to 1416.00
FIGURE 6 Delta Volume
Figure 7 shows a split of the Profile of May 14. Note that if I had been trading poorly, I’d have been stopped out at 1407.75 and suffered a small loss rather than making a small profit. I know of no other tool except Market Profile that gives me the sort of analytical power that enables early exit.
FIGURE 7 Market Profile EOD
So a great day! I was wrong about the market’s structure and direction and managed to make money. Boy, I’d love to do that every day of the week!
I believe my bottom line is showing improved results because I adopted the method suggested in ‘The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis’. By continually adopting a mindset that my view of the market is unproven; and then seeking to ’see’ what has to happen to prove it or disprove it, I am able to exit with reduced or no damage. Now, my old processes - ‘what has to happen for me to stay in? What has to happen for me to exit?’ - are similar with one critical difference: by using the word ‘UNPROVEN’ for my entry scenario, I find I am less likely to get myopic.
Speaking of ‘The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis’…… I draw your attention to the Announcement.



























May 17th, 2008 at 12:49 am
Ray
After ES took it on the chin during the first hour and a half of trading, we bottomed out around 10.30 and have moved up in a zig-zag pattern. A trend up to 12:15, a correction to 2:00 PM and a trend up to the end of the day. The whole day has a rotational look that was composed of 3 directional moves, one down and two up.
The market has stayed up to close at 1425.75 .
PROVEN: Uptrend is intact since it has held above 1420 level. Will move my stop sell up to the low of Thursday at 1407.75 when market opens on Monday.
May 17th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
MEMO
This morning I received from Snap-Scan the following:
http://www.snap-scan.com/us_ba_Ray+Barros.html
I refer to recent posts here about Amazon ranking of sales of books on their site.
With this “Alethiometer” interpretation of their rankings, NOT has shown an improvement with triple rankings of #1 from the link aforesaid.
May 19th, 2008 at 10:22 am
hi Ray, RE: Nature of Trends Pages 72-74, I am unclear about the example given for ,calculation of directional move ratio applications with Point of Control. Is this taken from, x-a on fig 4.8,. On page 74 under Application it mentions breakouts but i cant see on example. So i am a bit unsure of the formula or of the calculation points.Also as a side note,any signifigance to the TPO line disecting a majority of downside candles? Indicitive of a down trend? cheers Baz
May 19th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Hi Baz
I am sorry, I am not sure what questions you are asking.
Perhaps you can rephrase the question?
May 19th, 2008 at 2:13 pm
application of ratio between,directional move and point of control,on page 74. how do i calculate this. is it ratio between,x a, directional move(fig 4.8 page 72)and an uncharted breakout? how do i calculate ratio and where do i apply it. QUOTE N.O.T.”We use the ratio between the time taken for the directional move and Point of Control to warn us when a change of trend is possible.” I hope this is clearer as i am unsure how to exactly define it.If outside scope of blog or your back is giving pain,feel free to shoot me an email when suitable for you. thankyou Baz
May 19th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
Hi Baz
Sorry Mate - I still am not clear on the source of your confusion. Perhaps tonight’s blog will help.